pi wrote:
@Jukren54, I can see the point in not wanting to play cards that push you towards something that would be an incorrect choice. In the end though, shouldn't play skill prefail in such a situation?
I'm not saying that I end up making a mistake; I just hate having to make a decision and it always seems like I'm forced to Wrath away the Loth with little or no profit.
pi wrote:
I actually play the waiting game all the time with this deck. I have lots of removal, lots of big guys, just enough recursion. I will generally be holding many cards in hand up to the very end of the game. It is the kind of game I like.
Did you maybe see my argument on why it is not overextending? Because any fatty you play brings back another one (assuming no yard hate, which I don't face often), you can sculpt a very good hand, dropping fatties you don't mind losing and getting back those that can be a threat singlehandedly after the inevitable wrath resolves. This will set you up nicely for a long game where ultimately you will have the best starting position.
I realize we have different playstyles and it seems logical for you not to play it, but could you see it having merit for somebody who takes a more controlish approach to playing this deck?
Oh, I can see the merits of the controlling approach and the surprise win out of nowhere. The thing is that my playgroup can be super aggressive and forcing them to answer a board backed up by Spearbreaker puts them on the backfoot. I find that if I wait too long I get too far behind. This is true especially with the impact that the Eldrazi have had on EDH and the trouble that this deck has in dealing with them. Our different playstyles are a product of our different EDH decks and how we use them. I have others that fulfill my need to be a deck full of answers rather than questions.
My Mayael tends to falls into the aggro side for me because a lot of my other decks are bent on contol and sometimes it's just more fun to drop the guys and smash face. The effects that this deck can pack, with enough mana, are so powerful that the fatties can just run away with the game. This put me in the position to pack more redundant copies of certain effects, such as extra attack phases, instead of worrying about recurring the same ones over again to maintain tempo. Have you ever Tooth and Nailed for E-wit and a guy? I hate, hate doing that. I actually considered cutting E-wit from my decks because I spent too much time fiddling around with him (her?), getting back mana ramp cards in the mid to late game and not throwing around the weight of the deck. FYI I'm not actually going to do it but you can see what I mean.
The other thing is that in my playgroup there is always at least one or more players with GY hate over the course of the game. I also find that every fatty I draw is one I like (we're starting to get to the point where everything is good) and the Timmy in me craves the power of beating. By overextending I meant that playing the second guy with Loth on board just to get back the first guy. I also find that I when I have Loth down I never attack with it for fear of the defensive use of removal or retaliation by the defender.
Overall I'm not saying that recursion is bad and there are some times when there isn't any tempo to keep up with and using E-wit or Paleoloth is the right play, but if I have a hand full of guys I'm going to go aggro and rarely hold back.
_________________
I might make bipolar posts because I change my opinions a lot. Sorry.
I THINK in metaphors